2019: n/a: n/a . Awaiting decision means that the file is complete and we have not yet made a decision yet. Authors and their institutions are advised to coordinate any of their own publicity with the Journals and Editorial press office by e-mail after their paper is accepted for publication. Probably no answer to thisbut posting this will make me feel a little better? Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. Nature (Nature) A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. Thank you for visiting nature.com. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office atgro.solp@enosolp. Institutional conflict. Workshops: As a reader I will be interested to know the aim of the workshop. At the same time, do write a polite follow-up email to the journal requesting the current status of the manuscript. ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). Authors often ask for a new referee to be consulted, particularly in cases where two referees have been used and one is negative, the other positive. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. ISSN 1548-7091 (print), Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID). The stakeholder engagement has contributed positively in our study from formative phase to execution phase. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in The authors describe stakeholder engagement activities during the formative, intervention development, and study conduct phases of this project. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Commun. On submission, the manuscript is assigned to an editor covering the subject area, who seeks informal advice from scientific advisors and editorial colleagues, and who makes this initial decision. Thank you for visiting nature.com. manuscript under editorial consideration " nature. It is our pleasure to re-submit our manuscript entitled Stakeholder Engagement in a Hypertension and Diabetes Prevention Research Program to the editorial teams. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? This is known as a rescinding. Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. We look forward to your comments and remain with best regards; Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx, PONE-D-21-05456R1Stakeholder engagement in a hypertension and diabetes prevention research program Description and Lessons learnedPLOS ONE. "Editorial assessment of reviews" can mean that all reviewer send back their reviews and "Manuscript under editorial consideration" could mean that the editor hit the button "look at review". ISSN 1548-7105 (online) ISSN 1476-4687 (online) Geometric Distribution Expected Value Proof, It should be limited to the most essential and important aspects of the entry. In all cases, authors are expected to abide by the Nature Research press and embargo policies. We shed some light on how the Nature Methods editorial team evaluates papers submitted to the journal. For questions about submissions currently under editorial consideration please contact the journal Editorial Office at [emailprotected] For production enquiries please contact the journal Production Editor Allan Venida.. For general enquiries, please look at our support information.. For any other queries, contact the Open Research Support team. RSI welcomes the submission of original manuscripts on novel scientific instruments and techniques of experimental measurement and data analysis methods. But because we are not active scientists, we have no competing scientific or financial interests that might bias us toward or against a manuscript. before being sent to te reviewers an editor usually has a quick look at your paper - to see if you meet all the criteria of the journal (e.g. If anything, that notification is a signal to get ready for the next step. [CDATA[// >> The result and methods are available in detailed in the paper below and it is now cited. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Nu-flow Rice Concentrate, This is because you have been informed that your paper is under consideration for publication. We look for papers that demonstrate novel approaches to challenging and high-interest problems in basic biology research, enabling researchers to explore new corners of biology, or that solve nagging technical challenges. 26. The length of Isis articles varies, but we strongly encourage authors to submit articles between 8,000 and 12,000 words, including notes and abstract. Unfortunately, the majority of manuscripts received by publishing houses are immediately rejected. This referees opinion must be satisfied for the manuscript to be published, but as this referee may not know about the field concerned, an endorsement in isolation from the other referee(s) would not constitute grounds for publication. We aim to educate about and raise awareness of scientific and publishing issues through our Editorials and columns such as the Points of Significance. My manuscript submitted to Nat. gebirgsziege on Wed Jun 27 07:39:58 2012 said: 1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONEs publication criteria as it currently stands. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles We allow reviewers to reveal their identities to authors, should they so choose, and we also offer double-blind peer review as an author choice. //-->
manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods
